Equation 9 (from Markus's work notes) and the observed standard deviation are compared
EQUATION 9 is: s_noise (flux) =4*.0.721* [1 + 0.00168 flux + 0.00271 flux^2]^{1/2} =[s_const^2 + s_photon^2 + s_spikes^2]^{1/2}
where flux=average(data195A(420:720,500:800,*),3) quiet region only
OBSERVED STANDARD DEVIATION are calculated for each pixel by calculating the standard deviation of the time series
s_observed(x,y)=sigma(data195A(x,y,*))
the simulation takes a data cube (200,200,22) with constant value and adds poisson noise to it.
for these data set we know sigma_noise: sigma_noise = sqrt(flux)
then the simultions calculate sigma_observed as described above.
the theoretical sigma and the observed sigma for the simulation give the following plots:
the calculated noise is too large!
looks much better, still the calculated values are a little bit too large.